![]() ![]() (2) When he considers "neighborhood effects" (as something that violates freedom, as in our right not to have uneducated or homeless people interfere with our wellbeing) he fails to consider the possiblility that his core value, freedom, is violated by some of his recommendations. If you have more values, you find yourself not supporting most of his conclusions after you give some thought to how the other values play into the conclusions. His policy recommendations thus by definition only work if freedom is the only value one subscribes to. There are three primary problems: (1) he fails to consider any other values (such as equity, meritocracy, environmental sustainability, human rights or dignity, world hunger and starvation, concern for the wellbeing of others, etc.) that are also important to Americans. ![]() ![]() ![]() This is a good example of taking one value, freedom, and arguing policy from its implications on this value alone. Only if Freedom Means Absolutely Everything to You ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |